Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 27,2024 No.1 Detail

The Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in treatment of post-stroke epilepsy

Published on Feb. 08, 2024Total Views: 407 times Total Downloads: 163 times Download Mobile

Author: ZOU Dan 1 YANG Xingyong 2 HU Qiaozhi 1

Affiliation: 1. Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China 2. School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China

Keywords: Edaravone Sodium valproate Post-stroke epilepsy Meta-analysis

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202310037

Reference: ZOU Dan, YANG Xingyong, HU Qiaozhi.The Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in treatment of post stroke epilepsy[J].Zhongguo Yaoshi Zazhi,2024, 27(1): 145-154.DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202310037.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of sodium valproate and edaravone in the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE).

Methods  The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang database, and VIP databases were searched from the time of inception to May 2023. Randomized controlled trials of edaravone plus valproate versus valproate monotherapy for epilepsy were collected, the risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results  13 studies with a total of 1 092 patients were included. The results showed that the response rate was significantly higher in the combination group than in the sodium valproate group [RR=0.18, 95%CI (0.13 to 0.22), P<0.01]. The incidence of adverse reactions was lower [RR=0.73, 95%CI (0.48 to 1.13), P=0.16]. The seizure frequency [MD=-0.30, 95%CI (-0.43, -0.11), P<0.01] and duration of seizures [MD=- 0.81, 95%CI (-0.89, -0.72), P<0.01] in the combined treatment group were significantly lower than those in the sodium valproate group. The inflammatory factors tumor necrosis factor-α [MD=- 8.00, 95%CI (-9.15, -6.84), P<0.01], interleukin-2 [MD=-10.19, 95%CI (-14.61, -5.78), P<0.01], interleukin-8 [MD=-5.6, 95%CI (-6.48, -4.73), P<0.01] were significantly lower than those in the sodium valproate group. The neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level in patients with epilepsy in the combination treatment group was significantly better than that of the sodium valproate group at 1 month [MD=-4.73, 95%CI (-4.99, -4.46), P<0.01], 3 months [MD= -2.10, 95%CI (-3.26, -0.95), P<0.01], and 6 months after treatment [MD=-1.31, 95%CI (-2.35, -0.27), P<0.01]. There was no significant difference in NSE levels [MD=0.06, 95%CI (-0.07, 0.19), P=0.34] after 12 months.

Conclusion  Edaravone combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy can improve the epilepsy control rate of patients, shorten the frequency and duration of seizures, reduce the level of inflammatory factors in patients, promote the reduction of NSE levels, and improve their quality of life, which has a certain safety.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Galovic M, Ferreira-Atuesta C, Abraira L, et al. Seizures and epilepsy after stroke: epidemiology, biomarkers and management[J]. Drugs Aging, 2021, 38(4): 285-299. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-021-00837-7.

2.Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, et al. ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy[J]. Epilepsia, 2014, 55(4): 475-482. DOI: 10.1111/epi.12550.

3.Quirins M, Dussaule C, Denier C, et al. Epilepsy after stroke: definitions, problems and a practical approach for clinicians[J]. Rev Neurol (Paris), 2019, 175(3): 126-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.02.088.

4.刘英, 向小爽, 沙永红. 卒中后癫痫的研究进展[J]. 临床医药实践, 2022, 31(10): 778-782. [Liu Y, Xiang XS, Sha YH. The research progress of epilepsy after stroke[J]. Proceeding of Clinical Medicine, 2022, 31(10): 778-782.] DOI: 10.16047/j.cnki.cn14-1300/r.2022.10.021.

5.Yang H, Rajah G, Guo A, et al. Pathogenesis of epileptic seizures and epilepsy after stroke[J]. Neurol Res, 2018, 40(6): 426-432. DOI: 10.1080/01616412. 2018.1455014.

6.徐莹, 齐婧, 王群. 脑卒中后癫痫药物修饰治疗进展 [J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2023, 23(3): 167-172. [Xu Y, Qi J, Wang Q. Advances on disease modifying drugs for post-stroke epilepsy[J]. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2023, 23(3): 167-172.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731. 2023.03.004.

7.林思宁, 李建民, 刘俊杰, 等. 依达拉奉对大鼠颅脑创伤后神经元凋亡的影响[J]. 安徽医科大学学报, 2018, 53(5): 676-679. [Lin SN, Li JM, Liu JJ, et al. Effect of edaravone on neuronal apoptosis after traumatic brain injury in rats[J]. Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui, 2018, 53(5): 676-679.] DOI: 10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2018.05.004.

8.黄鹏, 唐川, 曾凡波. 人纤维蛋白原联合依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死静脉溶栓后出血转化伴凝血障碍观察 [J]. 中国药师, 2022, 25(5): 832-836. [Huang P, Tang C, Zeng FB. Observation of human fibrinogen combined with edaravone in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction with hemorrhagic transformation and coagulation disorder after intravenous thrombolysis[J]. China Pharmacist, 2022, 25(5): 832-836.] DOI: 10.19962/j.cnki.issn1008-049X.2022.05.014.

9.Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J]. BMJ, 2019, 366: 14898. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.

10.陈明珠, 胥洋, 张兴会, 等. 药物流行病学研究中处理偏倚的方法[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2021, 30(7): 431-434, 495. [Chen MZ, Xu Y, Zhang XH, et al. The method of dealing with bias in pharmacoepidemiology[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2021, 30(7): 431-434, 495.] DOI: 10.19960/j.cnki.issn1005-0698.2021.07.001.

11.李红艳, 王海山, 王永博,等. 阿替普酶与尿激酶导管接触性溶栓治疗下肢深静脉血栓有效性与安全性的Meta分析[J]. 医学新知, 2023, 33(4): 264-272. [Li HY, Wang HS, Wang YB, et al. Efficacy and safety of catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy of alteplase and urokinase for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: a Meta-analysis[J]. New Medicine, 2023, 33(4): 264-272.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202207035.

12.蔡丹东. 脑卒中后癫痫予以依达拉奉结合丙戊酸钠治疗对癫痫发作状况的缓解作用[J]. 保健文汇, 2023, 24(8): 181-184. [Cai DD. The effect of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy[J]. Baojianwenhui, 2023, 24(8): 181-184.] https://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail?id=PeriodicalPaper_bjwh202308046&dbid=WF_QK.

13.程廷华. 依达拉奉联合丙戊酸钠治疗脑卒中后继发性癫痫的药学分析[J]. 中华养生保健, 2022, 40(15): 164-167. [Chen TH. Pharmaceutical analysis of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy[J]. Chinese Health Care, 2022, 40(15): 164-167.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8011.2022.15.054.

14.范丽新. 脑卒中后继发性癫痫患者采用依达拉奉与丙戊酸钠联合治疗的临床效果及对NSE的影响分析 [J]. 当代医学, 2019, 25(3): 104-105. [Fan LX. Clinical efficacy of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in treatment of epilepsy patients with previous stroks and nse influence analysis[J]. Contemporary Medicine, 2019, 25(3): 104-105.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2019.03.044.

15.黄丹. 依达拉奉、丙戊酸钠联合治疗脑卒中后继发性癫痫的疗效及对NSE的影响[J]. 中国医药指南, 2021, 19(2): 85-86. [Huang D. Effect of edaravone combined with sodium valproate on secondary epilepsy after stroke and its effect on NSE[J]. Guide of China Medicine, 2021, 19(2): 85-86.] DOI: 10.15912/j.cnki.gocm. 2021.06.040.

16.姜春蕾. 依达拉奉、丙戊酸钠联合治疗脑卒中后继发性癫痫的疗效[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建, 2017, 12(2): 114-117. [Jiang CL. Clinical efficacy of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in treatment of e epilepsy patients with previous stroks[J]. Neural Injury and Functional Reconstruction, 2017, 12(2): 114-117.] DOI: 10.16780/j.cnki.sjsncjjjji.2017.02.006.

17.刘立. 依达拉奉、丙戊酸钠联合治疗脑卒中后继发性癫痫的疗效观察[J]. 首都食品与医药, 2020, 27(9): 79. [Liu L. Efficacy of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of secondary epilepsy after stroke[J]. Capital Food Medicine, 2020, 27(9): 79.] DOI: CNKI:SUN:YYSD.0.2020-09-063.

18.刘艳华, 王冶, 鲁东, 等. 依达拉奉联合丙戊酸钠治疗脑卒中后癫痫的疗效及对炎性因子的影响[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2022, 35(1): 52-55. [Liu YH, Wang Z, Lu D, et al. Efficacy of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of epilepsy after stroke and its effect on inflammatory factors[J]. Heilongjiang Medicine Journal, 2022, 35(1): 52-55.] DOI: 10.14035/j.cnki.hljyy.2022.01. 019.

19.漆苏. 依达拉奉结合丙戊酸钠治疗脑卒中后癫痫患者疗效观察[J]. 健康女性, 2022, 5(18): 22-24. [Qi S. Efficacy of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy[J]. Women's Health, 2022, 5(18): 22-24.] https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/ChlQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJTmV3UzIw MjMwNDI2EhpRS0JKQkQyMDIyMjAyMjA3MDgwMDAxNTIwNhoINGw0cmVxdW8%3D%R.

20.齐智慧, 李东晓. 依达拉奉联合丙戊酸钠对脑卒中后继发癫痫患者的临床疗效、神经元特异性烯醇化酶、炎症因子及不良反应的研究[J]. 国际神经病学神经外科学杂志, 2019, 46(2): 150-153. [Qi ZH, Li DX. Clinical effect of edaravone combined with sodium valproate on clinical outcome, neuron-specific enolase, inflammatory factors, and adverse reactions in patients with post-stroke epilepsy[J]. Journal of International Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2019, 46(2): 150-153.] DOI: 10.16636/j.cnki.jinn.2019.02.007.

21.秦桂艳, 李晓旭. 分析丙戊酸钠联合治疗对脑卒中后继发性癫痫的疗效及对NSE的影响[J]. 中国保健营养, 2021, 31(11): 240. [Qin GY, Li XX. To analyze the efficacy of sodium valproate combined therapy in the treatment of secondary epilepsy after stroke and its effect on NSE[J]. China Health Care & Nutrition, 2021, 31(11): 240.] https://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_zgbjyy-kp202111236.

22.王玉琦. 依达拉奉结合丙戊酸钠治疗脑卒中后癫痫的疗效分析[J]. 中外医疗, 2021, 40(17): 72-74. [Wang YQ. Analysis of the efficacy of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy[J]. China &Foreign Medical Treatment, 2021, 40(17): 72-74.] DOI: 10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2021.17.072.

23.武宁霞. 依达拉奉结合丙戊酸钠治疗脑卒中后癫痫的有效性及安全性研究[J]. 特别健康, 2021(31): 77. [Wu NX. The efficacy and safety of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy[J]. Special Health Issue, 2021(31): 77.] https://doc.taixueshu.com/journal/20214927jtbj.html.

24.张世军. 依达拉奉、丙戊酸钠联合治疗对脑卒中后继发性癫痫的疗效及对NSE的影响[J]. 当代医学, 2018, 24(2): 108-110. [Zhang SJ. The effect of edaravone combined with sodium valproate in the treatment of secondary epilepsy after stroke and its influence on NSE[J]. Contemporary Medicine, 2018, 24(2): 108-110.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2018.02.049.

25.Oktay S, Alev B, Tunali S, et al. Edaravone ameliorates the adverse effects of valproic acid toxicity in small intestine[J]. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 2015, 34(6): 654-661.DOI: 10.1177/0960327114554047.

Popular papers
Last 6 months