Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 26,2023 No.11 Detail

Clinical analysis of the analgesic effect of general anesthesia combined with different concentrations of ropivacaine for abdominal transverse muscle planar block in laparoscopic appendectomy

Published on Dec. 27, 2023Total Views: 388 times Total Downloads: 219 times Download Mobile

Author: Fu-Xing LIN 1 Qing-Gui CHEN 2 Bao-Xin MA 1 Ying HUANG 1

Affiliation: 1. Department of Surgical Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen 361004, Fujian Province, China 2. General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen 361004, Fujian Province, China

Keywords: Ropivacaine Transversus aabdominis plane block Laparoscopic appendectomy Analgesic effect

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202311067

Reference: Fu-Xing LIN, Qing-Gui CHEN, Bao-Xin MA, Ying HUANG.Clinical analysis of the analgesic effect of general anesthesia combined with different concentrations of ropivacaine for abdominal transverse muscle planar block in laparoscopic appendectomy[J].Zhongguo Yaoshi Zazhi,2023, 26(11):249-256.DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202311067.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To exploxe the analgesic effect of general anesthesia combined with different concentrations of ropivacaine and transverse abdominis plane block  on laparoscopic appendectomy (LA).

Methods  LA patients from Xiamen University Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital from January 2022 to July 2023 were included. All patients underwent general anesthesia combined ropivacaine plane block of the transverse abdominis muscle. According to the different concentrations of ropivacaine, patients were divided into high concentration group (0.50%, 20 mL), medium concentration group (0.375%, 20 mL) and low concentration group (0.25%, 20 mL). The dosage of fentanyl, postoperative bleeding, time of first press of the analgesic pump, and number of presses among three groups of patients were recorded and compared. The postoperative vital signs (mean arterial pressure and heart rate), pain level (NRS), comfort level (BCS) (1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h), and incidence of postoperative adverse reactions were observed and compared.

Results  This study included a total of 90 LA patients, with 30 cases in each group. The first press of the analgesic pump in the low concentration group was significantly shorter than that in the medium and high concentration groups (P<0.05), while the number of presses was significantly higher than the other two groups (P<0.05). The mean arterial pressure and heart rate significantly decreased with the increase of ropivacaine concentration at 1 hour after surgery (P<0.05); compared with 1 hour after surgery, the average arterial pressure and heart rate of patients in the medium concentration group and low concentration group significantly increased at 6 hours after surgery (P<0.05), and no significant changes occurred thereafter. The NRS scores of patients in the high concentration group were significantly lower than those in the medium and low concentration groups at all four postoperative time points (P<0.05); the NRS scores of patients in the medium concentration group were significantly lower than those in the low concentration group at four postoperative time points (P<0.05). The BCS scores of the low concentration higher than those of the medium concentration group and low concentration group an 1 h, 6 h and 24 h. The incidence of adverse reactions in the high concentration group was significantly higher than that in the low concentration group and the medium concentration group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the medium concentration group and the low concentration group (P>0.05).

Conclusion  General anesthesia combined with 0.50% ropivacaine abdominal transverse muscle plane block has a significant analgesic effect and high comfort for patients undergoing LA, but the risk of postoperative adverse reactions is high, and the plan needs to be adjusted according to the actual situation.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.麦天赋, 冼晓晖, 梁汉章. 经脐单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的效果比较[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2023, 36(5): 1153-1155. [Mai TF, Xian XH, Liang HZ. Comparison of the effects of transumbilical single hole laparoscopic and multi hole laparoscopic appendectomy[J]. Heilongjiang Pharmaceutical, 2023, 36(5): 1153-1155.] DOI: 10.14035/j.cnki.hljyy.2023.05.056.

2.Minneci PC, Hade EM, Lawrence AE, et al. Midwest pediatric surgery consortium. association of nonoperative management using antibiotic therapy vs laparoscopic appendectomy with treatment success and disability days in children with uncomplicated appendicitis[J]. JAMA. 2020, 324(6): 581-593. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020. 10888.

3.Shen Z, Sun P, Jiang M, et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a pilot study[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2022, 22(1): 63. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02139-7.

4.Maestroni U, Sortini D, Devito C, et al. A new method of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(9): 1336-1340. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9181-8.

5.Ergin A, İşcan Y, Çiyiltepe H, et al. Comparison of single-dermatome laparoscopic appendectomy with standard laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of postoperative pain and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2022, 32(4): 415-419. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001070.

6.Villadiego L, Baker BW. Improving pain management after cesarean birth using transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine as part of a multimodal regimen[J]. Nurs Womens Health, 2021, 25(5): 357-365. DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2021.07.009.

7.刘家飞, 刘力. 全麻联合罗哌卡因腹横肌横断阻滞和单纯全身麻醉对腹腔镜阑尾炎的疗效对比分析 [J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2018, 23(6): 1260-1262. [Liu JF, Liu L. Comparative analysis of the therapeutic effects of general anesthesia combined with ropivacaine abdominal transverse muscle block and simple general anesthesia on laparoscopic appendicitis[J]. Zhejiang Trauma Surgery, 2018, 23(6): 1260-1262.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009- 7147.2018.06.093.

8.曹丽燕, 刘庆仁, 杨俊华. 全麻联合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜阑尾炎手术镇痛效果观察[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2018, 29(17): 2696-2698. [Cao LY, Liu QR, Yang JH. Observation on the analgesic effect of general anesthesia combined with ropivacaine abdominal transverse muscle plane block in laparoscopic appendicitis surgery[J]. Modern Diagnosis and Treatment, 2018, 29(17): 2696-2698.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8174.2018.17.004.

9.赵艳茹, 都永强. 探讨全麻联合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞与单纯全麻对腹腔镜阑尾炎手术镇痛效果[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2019, 19(62): 99, 103. [Zhao YR, Du YQ. Exploring the analgesic effect of general anesthesia combined with ropivacaine abdominal transverse muscle plane block and simple general anesthesia on laparoscopic appendicitis surgery[J]. World's Latest Medical Information Digest, 2019, 19(62): 99, 103.] DOI: 10.19613/j.cnki. 1671-3141.2019.62.060.

10.朱允涛, 田丹丹, 吴电林. 全麻复合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞在慢性阑尾炎急性发作患者手术中的应用 [J]. 临床心身疾病杂志, 2021, 27(5): 131-133.[Zhu YT, Tian DD, Wu DL. The application of general anesthesia combined with ropivacaine abdominal transverse muscle plane block in surgery for patients with acute attack of chronic appendicitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases, 2021, 27(5): 131-133.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-187X.2021.05.034.

11.薄靳华, 王鑫梅, 孙玉娥, 等. 腹横肌平面阻滞用于切口疝修补术后镇痛效果的分析[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 43(11): 1574-1577. [Bo JH, Wang XM, Sun YE, et al. Analysis of the analgesic effect of abdominal transverse muscle plane block for incisional hernia repair surgery[J]. Journal of Nanjing Medical University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 43(11): 1574-1577.] DOI: 10.7655/NYDXBNS20231115.

12.郝英英, 石慧, 汤淑娴. 纳布啡作为佐剂行腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后疼痛及恢复质量的影响[J]. 中国当代医药, 2023, 30(28): 114-118. [Hao YY, Shi H, Tang SX. The effect of nabuprofen as an adjuvant for abdominal transverse muscle plane block on postoperative pain and recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery[J]. Contemporary Chinese Medicine, 2023, 30(28): 114-118.] DOI: 10.7655/NYDXBNS20231115.

13.杜新华, 李斯羽, 姜丽华. 不同剂量的氢吗啡酮复合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞对妇科腔镜术后镇痛的影响[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2022, 30(15): 2818-2821. [Du XH, Li SY, Jiang LH. Effects of different doses of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine on postoperative analgesia after gynecological endoscopy[J]. Modern Oncology, 2022, 30(15): 2818-2821.] DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2022.15.027.

14.Gundogan E, Carkit S, Cinar O, et al. Trocar site location in laparoscopic appendectomy-a prospective randomized study[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2023, 33(5): 451-455. DOI: 10.1097/SLE. 0000000000001214.

15.Human MJ, Tshifularo N, Mabitsela M. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in children: does the post-operative peritoneal drain make any difference? A pilot prospective randomised controlled trial[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2022, 38(9): 1291-1296. DOI: 10. 1007/s00383-022-05155-6.

16.Kromberg LS, Kildebro NV, Mortensen LQ, et al. Microbreaks in laparoscopic appendectomy have no effect on surgeons' performance and well-being[J]. J Surg Res,  2020, 251: 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j. jss.2020.01.007.

17.Ergün E, Gurbanov A, Gollu G, et al. Effects of intraperitoneal bupivacaine injection in laparoscopic appendectomy in children on post-operative pain: acontrolled randomized double-blinded studyp[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2022, 28(7): 974-978. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.68927.

18.Kaszyński M, Stankiewicz B, Pałko KJ, et al. Impact of lidocaine on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters during laparoscopic appendectomy in children[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 14038. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18243-3.

19.陈杰, 管小明, 冯淑燕. 腹横肌平面阻滞联合无阿片类药物全身麻醉技术对妇科腹腔镜术后恶心呕吐的影响[J]. 中外医疗, 2023, 42(13): 90-93, 110. [Chen J, Guan XM, Feng SY. The effect of transverse abdominis plane block combined with general anesthesia without opioid drugs on nausea and vomiting after gynecological laparoscopy[J]. Chinese and Foreign Medical, 2023, 42(13): 90-93, 110.] DOI: 10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742. 2023.13.090.

20.王燕. 腹横肌平面阻滞联合罗哌卡因在首次和多次行剖宫产分娩麻醉中的镇痛效果[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2023, 38(12): 2160-2164. [Wang Y. Analgesic effect of transverse abdominis plane block combined with ropivacaine in the first and multiple cesarean delivery anesthesia[J]. China Maternal and Child Health Care, 2023, 38(12): 2160-2164.] DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn. 1001-4411.2023.12.008.

21.王鑫, 王露. 罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞联合患者自控静脉镇痛在腹外疝术后镇痛效果[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(24): 3141-3144. [Wang X, Wang L. Analgesic effect of ropivacaine combined with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after abdominal external hernia surgery[J]. Journal of Practical Medicine, 2022, 38(24): 3141-3144.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022. 24.021.

22.哈米拉·沙依木别克, 张新疆, 高敬, 等. 右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞对妇科腹腔镜术后镇痛的效果研究[J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2023, 10(14): 68-71. [Hamila Shaymbek, Zhang XJ, Gao J, et al. Study on the analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in transverse abdominal muscle block after gynecological laparoscopy[J]. Journal of Applied Gynecologic Endocrinology, 2023, 10(14): 68-71.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-8803. 2023.14.021.

23.冯利英, 曹存礼. 罗哌卡因复合布托啡诺腹横肌平面阻滞麻醉对腹腔镜腹部手术患者应激反应及麻醉效果的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2022, 7(35): 118-120. [Feng LY, Cao CL. Effect of ropivacaine combined with butorphanol on stress response and anesthetic effect of patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery[J]. Clinical Medical Research and Practice, 2022, 7(35): 118-120.] DOI: 10.19381/j. issn.1001-7585.2022.11.031.

24.高孝坦. 超声引导下不同浓度罗哌卡因腰方肌阻滞在单侧疝修补术中的应用[D]. 福州: 福建医科大学, 2019.

25.李晓娟. 超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞镇痛中应用右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因的效果[J]. 吉林医学, 2023, 44(10): 2888-2891. [Li XJ. Effect of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block analgesia[J]. Jilin Medicine, 2023, 44(10): 2888-2891.] DOI: 10.3969/j. issn.1004-0412. 2023.10.063.

26.孙颖, 刘庄, 刘晓利, 等. 右美托咪定和芬太尼分别联合罗哌卡因对腹横肌平面阻滞剖宫产产妇的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(14): 109-113. [Sun Y, Liu Z, Liu XL, et al. Effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl combined with ropivacaine on parturient with transverse abdominis plane block in cesarean section[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(14): 109-113.] DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221004.

Popular papers
Last 6 months